本文以90年代詩界盤峰論爭為視角切入90年代詩歌的研究，又持著解構論爭、由論爭以外向內觀察的立場，既重新理解其時知識分子寫作與民間寫作的對立關係，又力圖呈現90年代詩歌在論爭對立格局以外複雜的寫作面貌與實踐意義。前三章以思想研究入手探討90年代詩的精神狀況，而後分別將知識分子寫作和民間寫作歸入智性寫作和口語寫作兩條各自的內在歷史脈絡，縱向考慮了新詩潮的演變，以及詩歌、詩人在90年代社會文化生活中的合法性。後四章從反詩實驗、個體詩學、文化交際、與非詩的時代共存四個寫作向度出發，思考這一時期的詩歌如何借助寫作具體參與到恢復詩歌話語權的進程當中，如何重新闡述詩歌的價值。90年代幾乎比以往任何一個時期都更關注詩歌自身的位置與價值，而理解這種價值，並不在於思想深度上，而是作為多元的寫作實踐，90年代詩逐漸恢復了文學的尊嚴、打開了自由多元的格局，同時在人們重建心靈的途中，提供了更富表現力、具協調溝通能力、在現實強音下堅持做夢的語言渠道和空間。

This paper takes the study of poetry in the 1990s from the perspective of the Pan Feng Debate. It re-understands the adversarial relationship between intellectual writing and popular writing, and also tries to present different features and practical significance of poetry in the 1990s, by deconstructing this debate and the outside-in observation of the debate. The first three chapters explore the spiritual state of poetry in the 1990s with ideological research, and then divides intellectual writing and popular writing into two internal historical lines of intellectual poetry and colloquial poetry, and vertically considers the evolution of new poetry, as well as the legitimacy of poetry in the social and cultural life of the 1990s. The latter four chapters start from four different writing paths, including anti-poetry experiments, individual poetics, cultural communication, coexistence of poetry and the non-poetic era, thinking about how poetry in this period specifically participates in the process of restoring discourse power, and how to re-explain the value of poetry. The poets of the 1990s paid more attention to the position and value of poetry than ever before. And this value is not mainly about the depth of thought. As a pluralistic writing practice, poetry in the 1990s gradually restored the dignity of literature and created a situation of freedom and pluralism. At the same time, it provides a more expressive, communicative, and imaginative language channel for people on the way to rebuild their spiritual world.