Transboundary pollution (e.g., air pollution and water pollution) cannot be tackled
effectively without cooperation among countries. However, countries usually have
drfferent views about the extent of damage pollution has on their citizens, and ths
makes cooperation on pollution control policy drfficult to acheve. Using a two-country
model, ths paper examines the possibility of adopting five alternative policy
coordmation schemes, i.e., (1) concertina rule, (2) one-to-one rule, (3) equiproportional
rule, (4) uniform rahal rule, and (5) harmonization rule. Ths paper finds that the first
four rules make a country better off at the expense of another country. Although the
harmonization rule makes each country's benefit less as compared to the four other
rules, both countries wdl benefit and therefore agree on using the harmonization rule to
reform the tax structure.
| Date of Award | 3 Oct 2006 |
|---|
| Original language | English |
|---|
| Awarding Institution | - City University of Hong Kong
|
|---|
| Supervisor | Siu Hung Eden YU (Supervisor) |
|---|
- Environmental impact charges
- Emissions trading
International pollution tax coordination: a two-country aspect with capital mobility and different views on pollution damage
JOR, W. S. (Author). 3 Oct 2006
Student thesis: Master's Thesis