Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Worst case signalling traffic for a multi-service access protocol

Research output: Chapters, Conference Papers, Creative and Literary WorksRGC 32 - Refereed conference paper (with host publication)peer-review

Abstract

Modern multi-service medium access protocols use a collision based capacity request signalling channel. Such signalling channels may be based on the Slotted Aloha multiaccess principle. This paper studies the performance of Slotted Aloha subject to extreme inter-station correlation by means of a discrete-time Markov chain analysis. We study conditions whereby the time to collision resolution becomes unacceptably high (defined as deadlock). Three signalling channel management schemes for alleviating the deadlock problem are evaluated. Of these, the Cyclic Contention Mini-Slot (CMS) sharing technique employing multiple CMS's per data slot is the one that extends the protocol's useable load region the furthest. We find that implementation of a scheme, which dynamically adjusts the p-persistence parameter towards its optimal value, is desirable. Both error free and error prone conditions are studied. The results highlight the fact that the critical signalling load is largely unaffected by the presence of errors, so that even in extremely error prone environments, the limiting performance factor is still the collision rate.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationIEEE International Conference on Communications
PublisherIEEE
Pages1431-1435
Volume3
Publication statusPublished - 1998
Externally publishedYes
Event1998 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC '98) - Atlanta, GA, United States
Duration: 7 Jun 199811 Jun 1998

Publication series

Name
Volume3

Conference

Conference1998 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC '98)
PlaceUnited States
CityAtlanta, GA
Period7/06/9811/06/98

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Worst case signalling traffic for a multi-service access protocol'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this