Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Withdrawal in construction project dispute negotiation

  • Sai On Cheung
  • , Pui Ting Chow

    Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

    Abstract

    A negotiation is doomed if a negotiator loses the desire to continue with the discussion, and it is described as withdrawal (WA). Construction project disputes are content-specific, with resolution options governed by the contract, thus fitting neatly with the rationality framework. Nevertheless, failure in construction project dispute negotiation (CPDN) is not uncommon. The prospect of having a successful negotiation is hampered when behavioral factors creep in. This study aims to uncover the underlying factors affecting WA in CPDN from a behavioral perspective. The behavioral tradition of negotiation study identifies three behavioral primers: motivation (task versus relation), cognition (emotion versus rationality), and personality (competition versus cooperation). With these, a relationship framework between WA and the three behavioral primers is proposed. With data collected from construction professionals in Hong Kong, the relationship framework is subjected to a confirmatory analysis by structural equation modelling (SEM). Emotion under the cognitive domain is found to be the most critical contributor to WA in CPDN. This finding reinforces the fact that negotiators should be good at the technical aspects of the dispute subject matter and be emotionally stable. © 2011 American Society of Civil Engineers.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1071-1079
    JournalJournal of Construction Engineering and Management
    Volume137
    Issue number12
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Dec 2011

    Research Keywords

    • Behavioral primers
    • Construction project dispute negotiation
    • Relationship framework
    • Withdrawal

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Withdrawal in construction project dispute negotiation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this