Why Confucian Meritocrats Must Be Democrats : Contesting Non-political Human Rights
Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews › RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal › peer-review
Author(s)
Related Research Unit(s)
Detail(s)
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 285-306 |
Journal / Publication | Contemporary Political Theory |
Volume | 22 |
Issue number | 3 |
Online published | 1 Dec 2022 |
Publication status | Published - Sept 2023 |
Link(s)
Abstract
After a decades-long debate on the compatibility between Confucianism and human rights, Confucian political theorists now seem to generally agree that the fallback theory of rights provides an account of human rights acceptable to both sides of the debate. Interestingly, some Confucian political meritocrats make a distinction between non-political human rights and political rights, and argue that while the former are subject to the fallback theory of rights, the latter are subject to the so-called “service conception” of rights, which authorizes political hierarchy among citizens. After identifying the irresolvable tension between the fallback theory of rights and the service conception of political rights as a critical threat to Confucian political meritocracy’s internal stability, this article suggests that Confucian political meritocracy can overcome the instability problem only by taking seriously the political implications of the fallback theory of rights, which entails the endorsement of the right to political participation.
Research Area(s)
- confucianism, fallback theory, human rights, political rights, service
Bibliographic Note
Full text of this publication does not contain sufficient affiliation information. Related Research Unit(s) information for this record is supplemented by the author(s) concerned.
Citation Format(s)
Why Confucian Meritocrats Must Be Democrats: Contesting Non-political Human Rights. / Kim, Sungmoon.
In: Contemporary Political Theory, Vol. 22, No. 3, 09.2023, p. 285-306.
In: Contemporary Political Theory, Vol. 22, No. 3, 09.2023, p. 285-306.
Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews › RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal › peer-review