Abstract
Much research on hedge fund activism (HFA) has focused on its antecedents and outcomes, but little is known about what occurs during the campaign process, especially how target firms respond to activists. Building on ideo-attribution effect, we develop an explanation concerning the role of CEO political ideology in determining target resistance. We argue that the more liberal (versus conservative) the target CEOs are, the more likely they will attribute the causes of HFA to contextual factors over which they may perceive little control and personal responsibility, which then leads to the target firms’ higher level of resistance to activists. This impact of CEOs’ political ideology is contingent on their perceived activism uncertainty and managerial discretion. In a sample of U.S. public firms from 2009 to 2020, we find support for our contentions. Our findings contribute to research on the HFA process, ideo-attribution effect, and corporate response to investor activism.
© 2023 Academy of Management
© 2023 Academy of Management
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Academy of Management Proceedings |
| Editors | Sonia Taneja |
| Publisher | Academy of Management |
| Volume | 2023 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Aug 2023 |
| Event | 83rd Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management (AOM 2023) - Boston, United States Duration: 4 Aug 2023 → 8 Aug 2023 https://aom.org/event-page/2023/08/04/higher-logic-calendar/the-83rd-annual-meeting-of-the-academy-of-management https://journals.aom.org/toc/amproc/2023/1 |
Conference
| Conference | 83rd Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management (AOM 2023) |
|---|---|
| Place | United States |
| City | Boston |
| Period | 4/08/23 → 8/08/23 |
| Internet address |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Whose fault is it? CEO Ideological Self-Attribution and Firm Resistance to Hedge Fund Activism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver