When the First Pulse Fades: 75% Reduction in Precedence Effect in Cochlear Implanted Rats

Alexa N Buck; Tim Fleiner; Nicole Rosskothen-Kuhl; Jan WH Schnupp

doi:10.1177/23312165261441709

When the First Pulse Fades: 75% Reduction in Precedence Effect in Cochlear Implanted Rats

Alexa N Buck (Co-first Author)
, Tim Fleiner (Co-first Author)
, Nicole Rosskothen-Kuhl^*
, Jan WH Schnupp^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Department of Neuroscience

Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews › RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal › peer-review

1 Downloads (CityUHK Scholars)

Abstract

It is widely known that users of cochlear implants (CIs) often show deficits in binaural hearing. In particular, interaural time difference (ITD) discrimination tends to be substantially worse in CI users. However, only very few studies have investigated how CI stimulation affects the “precedence effect” (PE), and how this might be affected by abnormal hearing experience during development. We performed behavioral experiments to measure temporal weighting functions (TWFs) to quantify the PE in three different cohorts of rats: normally hearing (NH) acoustically stimulated, neonatally deafened (ND) CI-stimulated, and adult deafened (AD) CI-stimulated animals. Lateralization responses were recorded to bursts of eight stimulus pulses in which the ITD of each pulse varied independently, and probit analysis revealed the perceptual weight of each pulse. The NH and ND-CI cohorts were tested at 50, 300, and 900 pps; the AD-CI animals were tested only at 300 pps. The NH animals show a pronounced “onset dominance” at higher pulse rates, that is, the weighting of the first pulse was much larger than for subsequent pulses, exactly as one would expect given previous studies on human listeners. In contrast, the TWFs for the ND-CI and AD-CI animals were much flatter, with a reduction of onset dominance by ∼75%, especially for higher pulse rates. Since neither of our CI cohorts had any experience of reverberation in their electric hearing, we interpret these results to indicate that the PE may require domain-specific experience to develop. © The Author(s) 2026. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

Original language	English
Number of pages	12
Journal	Trends in hearing
Volume	30
Online published	23 Apr 2026
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1177/23312165261441709
Publication status	Published - 2026

Funding

The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: We gratefully acknowledge funding from the Hong Kong Health and Medical Research Fund (grant no. 06172296), the Hong Kong General Research Fund (grant no. 11103823), the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) with funds from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) and the People Programme (Marie Curie Actions) of the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/20072013) under REA grant agreement no. 605728 (P.R.I.M.E.—Postdoctoral Researchers International Mobility Experience) and the Research Commission of the Medical Faculty of the Medical Center at the University of Freiburg, and the charity “Taube Kinder lernen hören e. V.” Eight cochlear implant animal arrays were kindly provided by MED-EL Medical Electronics, Innsbruck, Austria (Research Agreement PVFR2019/2). We acknowledge support by the Open Access Publication Fund of the University of Freiburg.

Research Keywords

cochlear implant
hearing experience
precedence effect
spatial hearing
temporal integration

Publisher's Copyright Statement

This full text is made available under CC-BY-NC 4.0. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

RGC Funding Information

RGC-funded

Access Output

10.1177/23312165261441709

483387616.pdfFinal Published version, 1.93 MBLicence: CC BY-NC

Other Access Options

Check CityUHK Library

Permanent Link

Right click to copy link

Cite this

@article{7fb90985643346eb9a0ce1b93501c08b,

title = "When the First Pulse Fades: 75\% Reduction in Precedence Effect in Cochlear Implanted Rats",

abstract = "It is widely known that users of cochlear implants (CIs) often show deficits in binaural hearing. In particular, interaural time difference (ITD) discrimination tends to be substantially worse in CI users. However, only very few studies have investigated how CI stimulation affects the “precedence effect” (PE), and how this might be affected by abnormal hearing experience during development. We performed behavioral experiments to measure temporal weighting functions (TWFs) to quantify the PE in three different cohorts of rats: normally hearing (NH) acoustically stimulated, neonatally deafened (ND) CI-stimulated, and adult deafened (AD) CI-stimulated animals. Lateralization responses were recorded to bursts of eight stimulus pulses in which the ITD of each pulse varied independently, and probit analysis revealed the perceptual weight of each pulse. The NH and ND-CI cohorts were tested at 50, 300, and 900 pps; the AD-CI animals were tested only at 300 pps. The NH animals show a pronounced “onset dominance” at higher pulse rates, that is, the weighting of the first pulse was much larger than for subsequent pulses, exactly as one would expect given previous studies on human listeners. In contrast, the TWFs for the ND-CI and AD-CI animals were much flatter, with a reduction of onset dominance by ∼75\%, especially for higher pulse rates. Since neither of our CI cohorts had any experience of reverberation in their electric hearing, we interpret these results to indicate that the PE may require domain-specific experience to develop. {\textcopyright} The Author(s) 2026. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).",

keywords = "cochlear implant, hearing experience, precedence effect, spatial hearing, temporal integration",

author = "Buck, \{Alexa N\} and Tim Fleiner and Nicole Rosskothen-Kuhl and Schnupp, \{Jan WH\}",

year = "2026",

doi = "10.1177/23312165261441709",

language = "English",

volume = "30",

journal = "Trends in hearing",

issn = "1084-7138",

publisher = "Sage Publications",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - When the First Pulse Fades

T2 - 75% Reduction in Precedence Effect in Cochlear Implanted Rats

AU - Buck, Alexa N

AU - Fleiner, Tim

AU - Rosskothen-Kuhl, Nicole

AU - Schnupp, Jan WH

PY - 2026

Y1 - 2026

N2 - It is widely known that users of cochlear implants (CIs) often show deficits in binaural hearing. In particular, interaural time difference (ITD) discrimination tends to be substantially worse in CI users. However, only very few studies have investigated how CI stimulation affects the “precedence effect” (PE), and how this might be affected by abnormal hearing experience during development. We performed behavioral experiments to measure temporal weighting functions (TWFs) to quantify the PE in three different cohorts of rats: normally hearing (NH) acoustically stimulated, neonatally deafened (ND) CI-stimulated, and adult deafened (AD) CI-stimulated animals. Lateralization responses were recorded to bursts of eight stimulus pulses in which the ITD of each pulse varied independently, and probit analysis revealed the perceptual weight of each pulse. The NH and ND-CI cohorts were tested at 50, 300, and 900 pps; the AD-CI animals were tested only at 300 pps. The NH animals show a pronounced “onset dominance” at higher pulse rates, that is, the weighting of the first pulse was much larger than for subsequent pulses, exactly as one would expect given previous studies on human listeners. In contrast, the TWFs for the ND-CI and AD-CI animals were much flatter, with a reduction of onset dominance by ∼75%, especially for higher pulse rates. Since neither of our CI cohorts had any experience of reverberation in their electric hearing, we interpret these results to indicate that the PE may require domain-specific experience to develop. © The Author(s) 2026. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

AB - It is widely known that users of cochlear implants (CIs) often show deficits in binaural hearing. In particular, interaural time difference (ITD) discrimination tends to be substantially worse in CI users. However, only very few studies have investigated how CI stimulation affects the “precedence effect” (PE), and how this might be affected by abnormal hearing experience during development. We performed behavioral experiments to measure temporal weighting functions (TWFs) to quantify the PE in three different cohorts of rats: normally hearing (NH) acoustically stimulated, neonatally deafened (ND) CI-stimulated, and adult deafened (AD) CI-stimulated animals. Lateralization responses were recorded to bursts of eight stimulus pulses in which the ITD of each pulse varied independently, and probit analysis revealed the perceptual weight of each pulse. The NH and ND-CI cohorts were tested at 50, 300, and 900 pps; the AD-CI animals were tested only at 300 pps. The NH animals show a pronounced “onset dominance” at higher pulse rates, that is, the weighting of the first pulse was much larger than for subsequent pulses, exactly as one would expect given previous studies on human listeners. In contrast, the TWFs for the ND-CI and AD-CI animals were much flatter, with a reduction of onset dominance by ∼75%, especially for higher pulse rates. Since neither of our CI cohorts had any experience of reverberation in their electric hearing, we interpret these results to indicate that the PE may require domain-specific experience to develop. © The Author(s) 2026. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

KW - cochlear implant

KW - hearing experience

KW - precedence effect

KW - spatial hearing

KW - temporal integration

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105036608287&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.scopus.com/record/pubmetrics.uri?eid=2-s2.0-105036608287&origin=recordpage

U2 - 10.1177/23312165261441709

DO - 10.1177/23312165261441709

M3 - RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal

C2 - 42023972

SN - 1084-7138

VL - 30

JO - Trends in hearing

JF - Trends in hearing

ER -

When the First Pulse Fades: 75% Reduction in Precedence Effect in Cochlear Implanted Rats

Abstract

Funding

Research Keywords

Publisher's Copyright Statement

RGC Funding Information

Access Output

Other Access Options

Permanent Link

Other Files and Links

Fingerprint

GRF-ExtU-Lead: How Does Experience Shape Binaural Cue Interaction In Bionic Hearing?

GRF: How Does Experience Shape Binaural Cue Interaction In Bionic Hearing?

Cite this

When the First Pulse Fades: 75% Reduction in Precedence Effect in Cochlear Implanted Rats

Abstract

Funding

Research Keywords

Publisher's Copyright Statement

RGC Funding Information

Access Output

Other Access Options

Permanent Link

Other Files and Links

Fingerprint

Projects

GRF-ExtU-Lead: How Does Experience Shape Binaural Cue Interaction In Bionic Hearing?

GRF: How Does Experience Shape Binaural Cue Interaction In Bionic Hearing?

Cite this