Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

When public participation in administration leads to trust: An empirical assessment of managers' perceptions

XiaoHu Wang, Montgomery Wan Wart

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 62 - Review of books or of software (or similar publications/items)peer-review

Abstract

This study empirically assesses the argument that public participation enhances public trust. A model was constructed to include five intermediate factors that might link participation and trust: consensus building, ethical behaviors, accountability practices, service competence, and managerial competence. As expected, participation does explain a significant amount of public trust. However, using path analysis, only two intermediate factors - ethical behaviors and service competence-were found to significantly contribute to trust. Even successful consensus-building activities are not likely to enhance trust unless administrative performance improves. These results indicate that if increasing public trust is the primary goal, then the primary focus should be on administrative integrity and performance results.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)265-278
JournalPublic Administration Review
Volume67
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2007
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'When public participation in administration leads to trust: An empirical assessment of managers' perceptions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this