Abstract
I show that improvements in one dimension of corporate ESG policy may come at the expense of another. In a difference-in-differences setting, I find that state-level paid sick leave mandates in the U.S. leads to better social performance, such as a narrower gen- der gap and higher employee satisfaction, but also worse environmental performance, evidenced by significant increases in pollution emission intensity and environmental violations at the firm level. This unintended negative impact on environmental perfor- mance is more pronounced for firms in high-pollution industries. My findings suggest that fulfilling ESG objectives not only imposes significant costs on the firm but also may not strategically complement each other.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Number of pages | 49 |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jul 2025 |
| Event | 2025 China International Conference in Finance - Shenzhen, China Duration: 29 Jun 2025 → 2 Jul 2025 Conference number: 2025 https://www.cicfconf.org/2025/m/index.html#!/index.html |
Conference
| Conference | 2025 China International Conference in Finance |
|---|---|
| Abbreviated title | 2025 CICF |
| Place | China |
| City | Shenzhen |
| Period | 29/06/25 → 2/07/25 |
| Internet address |
Bibliographical note
Research Unit(s) information for this publication is provided by the author(s) concerned.Research Keywords
- ESG
- Paid Sick Leave
- Environmental Performance
- Corporate Culture
- Diversity
- Trade-offs
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'When ESG Priorities Collide: Evidence from Paid Sick Leave Mandates'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver