Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

What's Wrong with Swearing?

Abida Malik (Co-first Author), Shane Ryan* (Co-first Author)

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

Abstract

This paper makes the case that a prima facie wrongness of swearing is due to the wrongness of disrespecting another person’s autonomy. This disrespect is manifested in the imposition of swearing and inhibiting reflective capacities, which is a consequence of swearing. In order to make this case, we start by defining and contrasting swearing with nearby concepts, as well as reviewing existing literature on swearing’s wrongness, which has tended to focus on offensiveness. Dual process theory is set out as it forms an important component of our account of swearing’s wrongness. In order to explain this wrongness, however, we first have to explain the wrongness of imposition and how this is connected to dual process theory. We explain how swearing evokes Type 1 cognitive processes in hearers and the threat this poses to autonomy. We elaborate on the boundaries of the wrongness of swearing by consideration of some final examples. © The Author(s) 2025


Original languageEnglish
JournalActa Analytica
Online published28 Sept 2025
DOIs
Publication statusOnline published - 28 Sept 2025

Bibliographical note

Full text of this publication does not contain sufficient affiliation information. With consent from the author(s) concerned, the Research Unit(s) information for this record is based on the existing academic department affiliation of the author(s)

Funding

Open access publishing enabled by City University of Hong Kong Library's agreement with Springer Nature

Research Keywords

  • Swearing
  • Imposition
  • Dual process theory
  • Autonomy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'What's Wrong with Swearing?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this