Abstract
This paper makes the case that a prima facie wrongness of swearing is due to the wrongness of disrespecting another person’s autonomy. This disrespect is manifested in the imposition of swearing and inhibiting reflective capacities, which is a consequence of swearing. In order to make this case, we start by defining and contrasting swearing with nearby concepts, as well as reviewing existing literature on swearing’s wrongness, which has tended to focus on offensiveness. Dual process theory is set out as it forms an important component of our account of swearing’s wrongness. In order to explain this wrongness, however, we first have to explain the wrongness of imposition and how this is connected to dual process theory. We explain how swearing evokes Type 1 cognitive processes in hearers and the threat this poses to autonomy. We elaborate on the boundaries of the wrongness of swearing by consideration of some final examples. © The Author(s) 2025
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Acta Analytica |
| Online published | 28 Sept 2025 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Online published - 28 Sept 2025 |
Bibliographical note
Full text of this publication does not contain sufficient affiliation information. With consent from the author(s) concerned, the Research Unit(s) information for this record is based on the existing academic department affiliation of the author(s)Funding
Open access publishing enabled by City University of Hong Kong Library's agreement with Springer Nature
Research Keywords
- Swearing
- Imposition
- Dual process theory
- Autonomy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'What's Wrong with Swearing?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver