Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

What we learn from using mass balance approach and oxidative conversion – A case study on PFAS contaminated soil samples

  • Qi Wang
  • , Patrick van Hees
  • , Patrik Karlsson
  • , Enmiao Jiao
  • , Marko Filipovic
  • , Paul K.S. Lam
  • , Leo W.Y. Yeung*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

7 Downloads (CityUHK Scholars)

Abstract

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are a large family of synthetic fluorinated chemicals. Studies using multiple analytical approaches to evaluate PFAS-contaminated soils are still limited, potentially leading to an underestimation of PFAS pollution. This study introduced a stepwise analytical workflow for a comprehensive assessment of organofluorine, integrating total fluorine (TF) determination, extractable organofluorine (EOF) analysis, PFAS target analysis, and PFAS precursor oxidative conversion assay. The workflow was applied to ten field soil samples collected from aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF)-contaminated sites. The sum target PFAS concentration (∑PFAS) ranged from 51.8 to 23200 ng/g dry weight. Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid was the predominant PFAS, accounting for 13 %–82 % (mean value: 53 %) of the ∑PFAS. Target PFAS accounted for 1 %–80 % of the EOF in the soil samples, and the integration of oxidative conversion revealed additional EOF contributions ranging from 0 % to 31 %. However, a considerable proportion (20 %–94 %) of unknown organofluorine still persists after combining targeted PFAS analysis and oxidative conversion, likely due to non-oxidizable PFAS, incomplete conversion of unknown PFAS precursors, and persistence of ultra-short chain PFAS post oxidative conversion. In addition, a significant positive correlation was observed between oxidative conversion and EOF results, but not with PFAS target analysis, suggesting that oxidative conversion may better represent the organofluorine burden in AFFF-impacted soils. Our findings indicate that TF analysis is unsuitable for tracing PFAS contamination in soils. Instead, combining oxidative conversion with routine PFAS target analysis is recommended to comprehensively assess PFAS contamination in soils. © 2025 The Authors.
Original languageEnglish
Article number126420
JournalEnvironmental Pollution
Volume376
Online published10 May 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2025

Funding

The authors acknowledged the Knowledge Foundation, Sweden. (KKS, projects: 20160019), Sweden, Eurofins Foundation. This work was partially supported by a fellowship award from the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China (Project No. CityU JRFS-1S03).

Research Keywords

  • Combustion ion chromatography
  • Extractable organofluorine (EOF)
  • Nontarget and suspect screening
  • PFAS precursor
  • The total fluorine (TF)
  • Total oxidizable precursor (TOP) assay
  • Ultra-short chains PFAS
  • Unknown PFAS

Publisher's Copyright Statement

  • This full text is made available under CC-BY 4.0. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

RGC Funding Information

  • RGC-funded

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'What we learn from using mass balance approach and oxidative conversion – A case study on PFAS contaminated soil samples'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this