What do researchers cite in their Literature Review sections? An exploratory study of citations in Information Systems research articles

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

1 Scopus Citations
View graph of relations

Related Research Unit(s)

Detail(s)

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)49-74
Journal / PublicationIberica
Issue number44
Publication statusPublished - 13 Dec 2022

Link(s)

Abstract

The Literature Review (LR) section is an integral part of a research article (RA) where the author needs to develop a theoretical groundwork to anchor his/her own study. However, the part-genre always eludes novice writers, which involves deciding what to cite from relevant past literature and what goals cited ideas serve therein. Insights are thus necessary into how experienced/expert writers address such issues. Unfortunately, there has been a dearth of research into this topic, with existing work focusing mainly on formal features and generic functions of source use. Motivated by the gap and the pedagogical need and grounded in Swales’s (1990) cARS model and Kwan and chan’s (2014) semantic typology of citations, this study is an attempt to examine semantic attributes of source ideas that get cited in different parts of LR sections of Information Systems RAs following a behavioral science research (bSR) paradigm. Findings reveal that distinct types of source ideas are cited, which are associated with the specific moves/steps of the LR sections and the bSR paradigm. A comparison of some of the cited ideas with the original ones from the source texts demonstrates that the latter have been re-contextualized to varying degrees to advance the arguments that the writers make in their LRs. Taken together, the study’s outcomes suggest that using a move-specific approach can yield useful insights into source use in LRs. Implications for citation teaching and future citation research will be drawn.

Research Area(s)

  • citation content, Information Systems, literature reviews, move analysis, re-contextualization

Download Statistics

No data available