Weightings of decision-making criteria for neighbourhood renewal : perspectives of university students in Hong Kong

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

View graph of relations

Author(s)

Detail(s)

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)238 - 258
Journal / PublicationJournal of Urban Regeneration and Renewal
Volume2
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2009

Abstract

Urban decay has long drawn great concerns of the society in Hong Kong. Different approaches have been promoted by public agents to curb the problem, including building rehabilitation and redevelopment. However, difficulties are often encountered in balancing the diverse interests of stakeholders in deciding on the way forward for a project. While multi-criteria decision-making models can be employed to facilitate the evaluation of available options, whether the process is sensitive to the project characteristics, such as scale and locality, has been not addressed. Through the structured questionnaire survey with 124 university students, we found that that from the perspective of young people, the rankings of decision criteria in terms of relative importance were very similar in Sai Yee Street and Kwun Tong Town Centre Projects. Yet, the magnitudes of perceived weightings for most criteria varied significantly across projects. These findings implied that projects with different characteristics should warrant different sets of criterion weightings to fit the specific constraints and circumstances in the projects. Practical implications for public administrators in formulating neighbourhood renewal strategy then follow.

Research Area(s)

  • Neighbourhood renewal, rehabilitation, redevelopment, multi-criteria decision making, Hong Kong