TY - JOUR
T1 - Waterfront development and planning control
T2 - a case study of Victoria Dockside in Hong Kong
AU - Xue, Charlie Qiuli
AU - Gu, Yanqiu
AU - Leung, Yu Hin
PY - 2024/12
Y1 - 2024/12
N2 - Planning control and building regulations are necessary tools for the safety, comfort, and well-being of the end-users of urban architecture. In capitalist societies, the government intervenes to balance the profit making of private interests with the needs of the public. However, this balance takes time to be formulated and perfected. This article reviews the evolution of Hong Kong’s building regulation after World War II and checks the example of Hong Kong’s urban waterfront to demonstrate how a private developer avoided various planning barriers to erect a bulky and tall building, namely K11, in a prominent waterfront location. Although K11 is an award-winning building, it sacrifices the sea view of pedestrians and inhabitants of other buildings. It is an out-of-context structure that has a negative visual impact. This type of dominating building seems alien in a modern society that values public well-being and engagement. Compared with the amendment of urban building regulations, this article examines the key moments in K11’s development and identifies the formation of loopholes in planning control. The case study provides insights into urban design controls and lesson for the stakeholders of prominent urban areas.
AB - Planning control and building regulations are necessary tools for the safety, comfort, and well-being of the end-users of urban architecture. In capitalist societies, the government intervenes to balance the profit making of private interests with the needs of the public. However, this balance takes time to be formulated and perfected. This article reviews the evolution of Hong Kong’s building regulation after World War II and checks the example of Hong Kong’s urban waterfront to demonstrate how a private developer avoided various planning barriers to erect a bulky and tall building, namely K11, in a prominent waterfront location. Although K11 is an award-winning building, it sacrifices the sea view of pedestrians and inhabitants of other buildings. It is an out-of-context structure that has a negative visual impact. This type of dominating building seems alien in a modern society that values public well-being and engagement. Compared with the amendment of urban building regulations, this article examines the key moments in K11’s development and identifies the formation of loopholes in planning control. The case study provides insights into urban design controls and lesson for the stakeholders of prominent urban areas.
KW - Waterfront development
KW - Urban design control
KW - Hong Kong
KW - Public interests
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85143840644&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.scopus.com/record/pubmetrics.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85143840644&origin=recordpage
U2 - 10.1057/s41289-022-00212-x
DO - 10.1057/s41289-022-00212-x
M3 - RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal
SN - 1357-5317
VL - 29
SP - 258
EP - 272
JO - Urban Design International
JF - Urban Design International
IS - 4
ER -