Voluntary quality disclosure and market interaction

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

134 Scopus Citations
View graph of relations

Author(s)

Detail(s)

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)488-501
Journal / PublicationMarketing Science
Volume28
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - May 2009
Externally publishedYes

Abstract

Marketers disclose quality information directly to potential consumers using a variety of communication channels. This study investigates how competition may influence duopoly firms' incentive to voluntarily reveal quality information. We show that firms in competitive markets reveal less information than a monopoly firm. In addition, sequential disclosure leads to asymmetric equilibrium disclosure behavior: the disclosure leader reveals unambiguously less information than in the simultaneous disclosure case, whereas the follower ex ante reveals less (more) private information than that released by the leader or by the firms in the simultaneous case when the disclosure cost is sufficiently low (high). We also examine the equilibrium firm profits and social welfare. We demonstrate that there may be a U-shaped relationship between equilibrium monopoly profits (or social welfare under both monopoly and duopoly) and the disclosure cost. Moreover, in comparison to the simultaneous disclosure case, sequential disclosure can lead to increasingly softened competition, improving both firm profitability and social welfare. © 2009 INFORMS.

Research Area(s)

  • Communication, Competition, Disclosure, Information transmission, Quality

Bibliographic Note

Publication details (e.g. title, author(s), publication statuses and dates) are captured on an “AS IS” and “AS AVAILABLE” basis at the time of record harvesting from the data source. Suggestions for further amendments or supplementary information can be sent to [email protected].

Citation Format(s)

Voluntary quality disclosure and market interaction. / Guo, Liang; Zhao, Ying.
In: Marketing Science, Vol. 28, No. 3, 05.2009, p. 488-501.

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review