社会组织在科技创新活动中具有独特地位和优势，其作用的发挥也正在受到越来越多的重视。通过构建政策工具与政策强度的二维计量框架，对推动社会组织参与科技创新活动的已有政策进行量化分析，发现我国当前政策体系基本覆盖了社会组织参与科技创新活动的各个方面，各类政策工具的使用趋于合理化，但能力建设式工具的使用还显得不足，决策咨询活动的政策强度难以满足当前需求，部门间的协同作用仍需进一步加强。实地调研收集的信息支持了计量分析的结论，并发现职业资格认证、参与科学研究等政策在实践中存在被误读的问题，还需进一步完善政策体系的顶层设计。

Social organizations have unique status and advantages in innovation activities, and more and more attention has been paid on their role. Through constructing the two-dimensional measurement framework including policy tools and policy strength and making quantitative analysis on the existing policy aiming at promoting innovation activities of social organizations, it finds that current policy basically covered all aspects of activities which social organizations participate in, and the use of various policy tools become reasonable. However, the use of capacity tools is inadequate, policy strength of decision consultation cannot meet current demand, and further strengthening of coordination between departments is necessary. The information collected from field research sup ports the conclusion of quantitative analysis, and finds that policies on professional accreditation and scientific research are misunderstood in practice, and the improvement on top-level design is needed.