TY - GEN
T1 - Unpacking the Polarizing Effect of Artificial Intelligence Orientation on Employee Relations
AU - Wang, Bing
AU - Fu, Longwang
AU - Chen, Fengwen
N1 - Research Unit(s) information for this publication is provided by the author(s) concerned.
PY - 2025/7/28
Y1 - 2025/7/28
N2 - This study investigates the polarizing effects of a firm’s artificial intelligence (AI) orientation on employee treatment and workplace relations. Drawing on the “automation-augmentation” paradox and social exchange theory, we argue that a greater AI orientation indicates the firm’s heightened need and emphasis on high-skilled employees, which in turn confer them a greater bargaining power against the firm, thus boosting the firm’s employee treatment strengths. Meanwhile, a greater AI orientation likely induces the marginalization of low-skilled employees, thus stimulating their adversarial responses in the workplace and then leading to exacerbated employer-employee conflicts. We further identify two boundary conditions moderating the AI orientation’s polarizing effects: one is the firm’s high-tech status, which may amplify the positive effect of AI orientation on employee treatment strengths and its deteriorating effect on employer-employee conflicts; the other is the firm’s employer reputation, which may weaken the positive effect of AI orientation on employee treatment strengths but accentuate its impact on employer-employee conflicts. Using a sample of Chinese listed firms from 2012 to 2021, we find strong support for our hypotheses. Our study contributes to extant research on AI orientation, employee relations, and workplace inequality. © Academy of Management Proceedings
AB - This study investigates the polarizing effects of a firm’s artificial intelligence (AI) orientation on employee treatment and workplace relations. Drawing on the “automation-augmentation” paradox and social exchange theory, we argue that a greater AI orientation indicates the firm’s heightened need and emphasis on high-skilled employees, which in turn confer them a greater bargaining power against the firm, thus boosting the firm’s employee treatment strengths. Meanwhile, a greater AI orientation likely induces the marginalization of low-skilled employees, thus stimulating their adversarial responses in the workplace and then leading to exacerbated employer-employee conflicts. We further identify two boundary conditions moderating the AI orientation’s polarizing effects: one is the firm’s high-tech status, which may amplify the positive effect of AI orientation on employee treatment strengths and its deteriorating effect on employer-employee conflicts; the other is the firm’s employer reputation, which may weaken the positive effect of AI orientation on employee treatment strengths but accentuate its impact on employer-employee conflicts. Using a sample of Chinese listed firms from 2012 to 2021, we find strong support for our hypotheses. Our study contributes to extant research on AI orientation, employee relations, and workplace inequality. © Academy of Management Proceedings
U2 - 10.5465/AMPROC.2025.17204abstract
DO - 10.5465/AMPROC.2025.17204abstract
M3 - RGC 32 - Refereed conference paper (with host publication)
T3 - Academy of Management Proceedings
BT - Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings
A2 - Taneja, Sonia
PB - Academy of Management
T2 - 85th Annual meeting of the Academy of Management
Y2 - 25 July 2025 through 29 July 2025
ER -