Abstract
This chapter analyses the judicial approach adopted by Chinese courts, particularly the Supreme People’s Court, in developing a critical foundation for the law of unjustified enrichment in China. It reveals that considerable uncertainty remains with the ‘absence of basis’ approach and that flexible yet elusive notions such as ‘unfairness’, ‘unreasonableness’ and ‘impropriety’ may still play a role. While such uncertainty is perhaps inevitable as Chinese courts search for a path that best suits the local environment, greater clarity and certainty is desirable. Achieving such clarity and certainty may be greatly facilitated by learning from detailed comparisons with foreign laws, including particularly the pragmatically oriented common law rules.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Shaping the Law of Obligations |
| Subtitle of host publication | Essays in Honour of Professor Ewan McKendrick KC |
| Editors | Edwin Peel, Rebecca Probert |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press |
| Chapter | 22 |
| Pages | 367-381 |
| Edition | 1 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9780198889762 |
| Publication status | Published - 30 Nov 2023 |
Bibliographical note
Research Unit(s) information for this publication is provided by the author(s) concerned.Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Unjustified Enrichment in China: An Uncertain Path'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver