Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Unjustified Enrichment in China: An Uncertain Path

Research output: Chapters, Conference Papers, Creative and Literary WorksRGC 12 - Chapter in an edited book (Author)

Abstract

This chapter analyses the judicial approach adopted by Chinese courts, particularly the Supreme People’s Court, in developing a critical foundation for the law of unjustified enrichment in China. It reveals that considerable uncertainty remains with the ‘absence of basis’ approach and that flexible yet elusive notions such as ‘unfairness’, ‘unreasonableness’ and ‘impropriety’ may still play a role. While such uncertainty is perhaps inevitable as Chinese courts search for a path that best suits the local environment, greater clarity and certainty is desirable. Achieving such clarity and certainty may be greatly facilitated by learning from detailed comparisons with foreign laws, including particularly the pragmatically oriented common law rules.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationShaping the Law of Obligations
Subtitle of host publicationEssays in Honour of Professor Ewan McKendrick KC
EditorsEdwin Peel, Rebecca Probert
PublisherOxford University Press
Chapter22
Pages367-381
Edition1
ISBN (Print)9780198889762
Publication statusPublished - 30 Nov 2023

Bibliographical note

Research Unit(s) information for this publication is provided by the author(s) concerned.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Unjustified Enrichment in China: An Uncertain Path'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this