Abstract
Background : Family members often take on the caregiver roles to stroke survivors due to kinships and cultural responsibilities. Yet, little is known about the the impact of survivor-caregiver dynamics on stroke rehabilitation. To understand the dyadic relationships between the dyads, a systematic review was conducted to examine studies which have adopted Actor–Partner Interdependence Model (APIM) analysis.
Methods : A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted using the following electronic databases: PubMed, SAGE Journals, MEDLINE, PsycINFO and Cochrane Review to identify eligible studies published from their inception to December 2021, following the PRISMA guidelines.
Results : Nine studies involving 1183 stroke survivors (male = 57%) and 1181 caregivers (male = 37%) had met the inclusion criteria and were identified in this review. The interaction among the following outcomes were self-esteem, optimism, stress, depression, emotional distress, quality of life, and life satisfaction. The review provided evidence that (1) APIM is valuable tool in analyzing dyadic interactions; (2) support from caregivers has a significant impact on the stroke survivor’s recovery; (3) the mental health status of caregivers can influence that of stroke survivors and vice versa; (4) Due to the interconnected nature of dyadic interaction, providing dyadic intervention have positive impact on dyads.
Conclusion : These findings highlight the interdependence nature between survivor-caregiver dyads in the context of stroke rehabilitation. The APIM provides conclusive evidence on the effectiveness of survivor-caregiver dyadic interactions, with significant theoretical and practice implications for both health and social care professions. More research is needed to support dyadic strategies for stroke survivors.
Methods : A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted using the following electronic databases: PubMed, SAGE Journals, MEDLINE, PsycINFO and Cochrane Review to identify eligible studies published from their inception to December 2021, following the PRISMA guidelines.
Results : Nine studies involving 1183 stroke survivors (male = 57%) and 1181 caregivers (male = 37%) had met the inclusion criteria and were identified in this review. The interaction among the following outcomes were self-esteem, optimism, stress, depression, emotional distress, quality of life, and life satisfaction. The review provided evidence that (1) APIM is valuable tool in analyzing dyadic interactions; (2) support from caregivers has a significant impact on the stroke survivor’s recovery; (3) the mental health status of caregivers can influence that of stroke survivors and vice versa; (4) Due to the interconnected nature of dyadic interaction, providing dyadic intervention have positive impact on dyads.
Conclusion : These findings highlight the interdependence nature between survivor-caregiver dyads in the context of stroke rehabilitation. The APIM provides conclusive evidence on the effectiveness of survivor-caregiver dyadic interactions, with significant theoretical and practice implications for both health and social care professions. More research is needed to support dyadic strategies for stroke survivors.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Innovation In Aging |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press |
| Pages | 634 |
| Volume | 6 (Supplement_1) |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Nov 2022 |
| Event | Gerontological Society of America 2022 Annual Scientific Meeting (GSA 2022): “Embracing our Diversity. Enriching Our Discovery. Reimagining Aging.” - Indiana Convention Center, Indianapolis, United States Duration: 2 Nov 2022 → 6 Nov 2022 https://www.gsa2022.org/ https://www.eventscribe.net/2022/GSA2022/ |
Conference
| Conference | Gerontological Society of America 2022 Annual Scientific Meeting (GSA 2022) |
|---|---|
| Place | United States |
| City | Indianapolis |
| Period | 2/11/22 → 6/11/22 |
| Internet address |
Bibliographical note
Research Unit(s) information for this publication is provided by the author(s) concerned.Research Keywords
- Family Caregiving, Social Networks, and Social Support