Understanding Co roles towards developing Co-free Ni-rich cathodes for rechargeable batteries

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

351 Scopus Citations
View graph of relations

Author(s)

  • Tongchao Liu
  • Lei Yu
  • Jiajie Liu
  • Jun Lu
  • Xuanxuan Bi
  • Alvin Dai
  • Matthew Li
  • Maofan Li
  • Zongxiang Hu
  • Lu Ma
  • Duan Luo
  • Jiaxin Zheng
  • Tianpin Wu
  • Jianguo Wen
  • Feng Pan
  • Khalil Amine

Detail(s)

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)277-286
Journal / PublicationNature Energy
Volume6
Issue number3
Online published18 Feb 2021
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2021
Externally publishedYes

Abstract

Current bottlenecks in cobalt (Co) supply have negatively impacted commercial battery production and inspired the development of cathode materials that are less reliant on Co. However, complete Co elimination is prevented by the lack of fundamental understanding of the impact of Co on cathode capacity and structural stability, as well as the lack of effective substitute components in practice. Here we investigate the roles of Co in purposely designed systems that include both Co-rich and Mn-substituted Co-free cathodes. Our results affirmed that Co plays an undeniable role in fast capacity and/or structural degradation, and found that Co is more destructive than Ni at high potentials, which offers unexpected but encouraging perspectives for Co reduction. Moreover, Mn substitution effectively alleviates the destructive effects of Co and enables a high potential functionality. With these fundamental discoveries, we demonstrated a series of LiNiαMnβXγO2 (X = single or multiple dopants) as a promising candidate for Co-free cathodes.

Citation Format(s)

Understanding Co roles towards developing Co-free Ni-rich cathodes for rechargeable batteries. / Liu, Tongchao; Yu, Lei; Liu, Jiajie et al.
In: Nature Energy, Vol. 6, No. 3, 03.2021, p. 277-286.

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review