Abstract
This essay attempts a philosophical reflection of the Confucian ideal of "scholar-official" in Joseon Korea's neo-Confucian context. It explores why this noble ideal of a Confucian public being had to suffer many moral-political problems in reality. It argues first that because the institution of Confucian scholar-official was actually a modus-operandi compromise between Confucianism and Legalism, the Confucian scholar-officials were torn between their ethical commitment to Confucianism and their political commitment to the state; and second, that because the Cheng-Zhu neo-Confucianism vigorously imported and indigenized by Joseon Koreans exalted the family over the state, Joseon neo-Confucian scholar-officials were torn between two competing moral obligations, filiality and loyalty. The essay concludes by discussing whether, given the problems with which the ideal of the Confucian scholar-official was frequently entangled, liberal individualism should be pursued as its normative alternative. © 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 29-48 |
| Journal | Dao |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Mar 2009 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Research Keywords
- Filiality
- Legalistic confucianism
- Loyalty
- Neo-confucianism
- Scholar-official
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Trouble with Korean confucianism: Scholar-official between ideal and reality'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver