Travel Time and Distance in International Perspective: A Comparison between Nanjing (China) and the Randstad (The Netherlands)

Jianxi Feng, Martin Dijst, Jan Prillwitz, Bart Wissink

    Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

    52 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    While Western countries are trying to reduce car dependency on the back of low carbon objectives, the ownership and use of private cars in urban China is increasing dramatically. In this paper, light is shed on both developments through a comparative study of the travel behaviour in two regions with a very different built environment: Nanjing, China, and the Randstad in the Netherlands. Controlled for car ownership, daily travel time and distance are analysed in both regions. The results indicate that, in the case of Nanjing, the suggestion is that the configurations of current land use which support walking and cycling should be preserved as much as possible and that, in the meanwhile, investments should be made in fast public transport to facilitate economic developments. As regards the Randstad, it would seem wise to promote the use of walking and cycling by continuing to encourage compact land use patterns in combination with relatively fast public transport developments. © 2013 Urban Studies Journal Limited.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)2993-3010
    JournalUrban Studies
    Volume50
    Issue number14
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Nov 2013

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Travel Time and Distance in International Perspective: A Comparison between Nanjing (China) and the Randstad (The Netherlands)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this