Abstract
Hong Kong has been depicted as an administrative state where the civil service is insulated from political and societal forces and enjoys a stable pattern of growth in rewards and status. In these respects, it is similar to other Asian developmental states. In Asia, as in the West, traditions underlying the administrative state are being challenged. The Hong Kong civil service has recently come under serious criticism as a result of a major fiscal crisis and a series of administrative failures, while the unelected status of the chief executive is a focus of growing protest. What is the reform capacity of the Hong Kong bureaucracy in these circumstances? What is the likely trajectory of administrative reform, and can we expect Western models of the neo-administrative state to be relevant and appropriate to Hong Kong and, by extension, to the rest of Asia?
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 335-346 |
| Journal | Public Administration Review |
| Volume | 65 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - May 2005 |
Bibliographical note
Publication details (e.g. title, author(s), publication statuses and dates) are captured on an “AS IS” and “AS AVAILABLE” basis at the time of record harvesting from the data source. Suggestions for further amendments or supplementary information can be sent to [email protected].Funding
Research for this article was conducted with the financial support of the City University of Hong Kong, Research Project No. 7001376. I would like to thank Dr. Lina Vyas for her assistance in collecting research materials and three anonymous re-viewers of the original manuscript for their valuable suggestions.
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Transforming the administrative state: Reform in Hong Kong and the future of the developmental state'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver