Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Towards a socio-ecological perspective of the “biopsychosocial model of pain”: Delineation of pathways between perceived pain intensity, community capital and mental distress among community-dwelling individuals

Yuchang Bao, Chi Wai Cheung*, Wentao Bai, Hung Chak Ho*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

Abstract

According to the “biopsychosocial model of pain”, pain can lead to significant effects on mental distress. However, previous studies have not linked this model to a socio-ecological perspective, although it is generally assumed that a supportive neighborhood environment can improve mental well-being. In particular, it is unclear how the built and social environment can be considered as community capital to improve the perceived quality of social and health services and support community-dwelling individuals. Following the “Community Capitals Framework” and the “Transdisciplinary Neighborhood Health Framework”, this study considered the perceived quality of urban amenities and their satisfaction as factors of 'built capital' and sub-factors of subjective (or personal) wellbeing as factors of 'social capital' and 'psychological capital'. This study found that several subfactors of wellbeing (e.g., community connectedness and achievement in life) may not be able to develop significant pathways. In addition, significant pain-related pathways contributed to mental distress via overall satisfaction with urban amenities and satisfaction with health facilities, and were associated with risk perception and health status. However, pathways related to satisfaction with social amenities (e.g., community facilities, indoor sports facilities) were associated with quality-of-life outcomes (e.g., standard of living and future security) rather than personal health status, possibly reflecting appreciation of the built environment and its perceived quality. The above results suggest that the sub-factors related to community capital play different roles in the biopsychosocial contexts of pain. These findings can be used to suggest multidimensional strategies to support pain patients living in the community. In particular, improving risk perception for injury prevention should be considered. © 2026 Elsevier Ltd. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.
Original languageEnglish
Article number103614
JournalHealth and Place
Volume98
Online published22 Jan 2026
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2026

Funding

This study is partial supported by Peter Hung Professorship in Pain Research, H H Hung Charitable Foundation and Viatris Inc. Acknowledgment of the Involvement of the Funder: Financial Support.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
  2. SDG 10 - Reduced Inequalities
    SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
  3. SDG 11 - Sustainable Cities and Communities
    SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities

Research Keywords

  • Pain intensity
  • Neighborhood satisfaction
  • Urban amenities
  • Perceived environmental quality
  • Personal wellbeing
  • Mental distress

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Towards a socio-ecological perspective of the “biopsychosocial model of pain”: Delineation of pathways between perceived pain intensity, community capital and mental distress among community-dwelling individuals'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this