Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

TiN versus TiSiN coatings in indentation, scratch and wear setting

  • Rumana Akhter*
  • , Zhifeng Zhou
  • , Zonghan Xie
  • , Paul Munroe
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews › RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal › peer-review

Abstract

The indentation response, scratch behaviour and wear performance of binary TiN and ternary TiSiN coatings under a variety of loading conditions were comparatively studied. The coatings were fabricated onto M42 steel substrates via closed field unbalanced magnetron sputtering ion plating. A maximum hardness value of ~40 GPa was obtained for one of the TiSiN coatings as compared to ~28 GPa for TiN. This was attributed to the nanocomposite structure, grain refinement, solid solution hardening and the higher compressive residual stress in the ternary coatings. The damage resistance of both the TiN and TiSiN coatings under indentation loading was governed by the dampening effects of sliding or shearing of the columnar grains along the grain boundaries coupled with the coatings’ respective mechanical characteristics. Improved scratch adhesion properties (i.e., higher LC1, LC2 and CPR values) were also observed for the TiSiN coatings that were underlain by their superior mechanical properties along with the graded structure, promoting the capacity to resist crack formation and delamination. Lower wear rates for the TiSiN coatings during dry sliding were found to be consistent with their higher H/Er, H3/Er 2 and We values.
Original languageEnglish
Article number150356
JournalApplied Surface Science
Volume563
Online published11 Jun 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Oct 2021

Research Keywords

  • Adhesion strength
  • Indentation behaviour
  • Mechanical properties
  • Microstructure
  • TiSiN coating
  • Wear performance

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'TiN versus TiSiN coatings in indentation, scratch and wear setting'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this