Thermally modified graphite electrodes for the positive side of the zinc-cerium redox flow battery
Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews › RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal › peer-review
Author(s)
Related Research Unit(s)
Detail(s)
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | A809-A819 |
Journal / Publication | Journal of the Electrochemical Society |
Volume | 162 |
Issue number | 6 |
Publication status | Published - 2015 |
Link(s)
Abstract
In this study, thermal modification of graphite electrodes for the positive side of the Zinc-Cerium redox flow battery is found to enhance their performance and stability by providing a larger and more chemically active surface area to carry out the Ce(III)/(IV) reaction. Prolonged calcination (>9.5 h) and firing temperatures greater than 600°C lead to a physical deterioration of the samples while at 300°C no effect on the cerium reaction within the investigated reaction temperature range (25-55°C) is evident. When treated at 600°C for 6 h, the milder oxidation conditions result in a porous graphite electrode (7.13 m2 g-1) with a low charge transfer resistance (0.14 mΩ cm-2) and negligible weight loss (WTL = 6%). This thermally treated electrode is robust under repetitive cycling (300 cyclic voltammograms) with no degradation occurring within the time frame of the experiment (20 h). The quasi-reversible kinetics of the Ce(III)/(IV) reaction improve with elevated temperatures (ko = 6.0 × 10-3 cm s-1, D = 8.5 × 10-6 cm2 s-1 and jo = 2.91 × 10-3 A cm-2) and are comparable to the present electrode of choice on this flow battery, the Pt-Ti mesh electrode.
Citation Format(s)
Thermally modified graphite electrodes for the positive side of the zinc-cerium redox flow battery. / Nikiforidis, Georgios; Daoud, Walid A.
In: Journal of the Electrochemical Society, Vol. 162, No. 6, 2015, p. A809-A819.
In: Journal of the Electrochemical Society, Vol. 162, No. 6, 2015, p. A809-A819.
Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews › RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal › peer-review