The young Van Dyck's fingerprint : A technical approach to assess the authenticity of a disputed painting
Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews › RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal › peer-review
Author(s)
Detail(s)
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 22 |
Journal / Publication | Heritage Science |
Volume | 5 |
Issue number | 1 |
Publication status | Published - 9 Jun 2017 |
Externally published | Yes |
Link(s)
DOI | DOI |
---|---|
Attachment(s) | Documents
Publisher's Copyright Statement
|
Link to Scopus | https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85020425341&origin=recordpage |
Permanent Link | https://scholars.cityu.edu.hk/en/publications/publication(63b6da56-e0c1-4437-9d41-3a3b45f603dd).html |
Abstract
The painting Saint Jerome, part of the collection of the Maagdenhuis Museum (Antwerp, Belgium), is attributed to the young Anthony van Dyck (1613-1621) with reservations. The painting displays remarkable compositional and iconographic similarities with two early Van Dyck works (1618-1620) now in Museum Boijmans van Beuningen (Rotterdam) and Nationalmuseum (Stockholm). Despite these similarities, previous art historical research did not result in a clear attribution to this master. In this study, the work's authenticity as a young Van Dyck painting was assessed from a technical perspective by employing a twofold approach. First, technical information on Van Dyck's materials and techniques, here identified as his fingerprint, were defined based on a literature review. Second, the materials and techniques of the questioned Saint Jerome painting were characterized by using complementary imaging techniques: infrared reflectography, X-ray radiography and macro X-ray fluorescence scanning. The insights from this non-invasive research were supplemented with analysis of a limited number of cross-sections by means of field emission scanning electron microscopy coupled with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. The results demonstrated that the questioned painting's materials and techniques deviate from Van Dyck's fingerprint, thus making the authorship of this master very unlikely.
Research Area(s)
- Anthony van Dyck, Attribution problems, FE-SEM-EDX, IRR, MA-XRF scanning, Saint Jerome, XRR
Bibliographic Note
Publication details (e.g. title, author(s), publication statuses and dates) are captured on an “AS IS” and “AS AVAILABLE” basis at the time of record harvesting from the data source. Suggestions for further amendments or supplementary information can be sent to [email protected].
Citation Format(s)
The young Van Dyck's fingerprint: A technical approach to assess the authenticity of a disputed painting. / Harth, Astrid; Van der Snickt, Geert; Schalm, Olivier et al.
In: Heritage Science, Vol. 5, No. 1, 22, 09.06.2017.
In: Heritage Science, Vol. 5, No. 1, 22, 09.06.2017.
Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews › RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal › peer-review
Download Statistics
No data available