The two-dimensional vector packing problem with general costs
Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews (RGC: 21, 22, 62) › 21_Publication in refereed journal › peer-review
Author(s)
Related Research Unit(s)
Detail(s)
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 59-69 |
Journal / Publication | Omega (United Kingdom) |
Volume | 74 |
Online published | 24 Jan 2017 |
Publication status | Published - Jan 2018 |
Link(s)
Abstract
The two-dimensional vector packing problem with general costs (2DVPP-GC) arises in logistics where shipping items of different weight and volume are packed into cartons before being transported by a courier company. In practice, the delivery cost of a carton of items is usually retrieved from a cost table. The costs may not preserve any known mathematical function since it could specify arbitrary price at any possible weight. Such a general pricing scheme meets a majority of real-world bin packing applications, where the price of delivery service is determined by many complicated and correlated factors. Compared to the classical bin packing problem and its variants, the 2DVPP-GC is more complex and challenging. To solve the 2DVPP-GC with minimizing the total cost, we propose a memetic algorithm to compute solutions of high quality. Fitness functions and improved operators are proposed to achieve effectiveness. Computational experiments on a variety of test instances show that the algorithm is competent to solve the 2DVPP-GC. In particular, optimal solutions are found in a second for all the test instances that have a known optimal solution.
Research Area(s)
- Application, Bin packing, General costs, Memetic algorithm, Two-dimensional vector packing
Citation Format(s)
The two-dimensional vector packing problem with general costs. / Hu, Qian; Wei, Lijun; Lim, Andrew.
In: Omega (United Kingdom), Vol. 74, 01.2018, p. 59-69.
In: Omega (United Kingdom), Vol. 74, 01.2018, p. 59-69.
Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews (RGC: 21, 22, 62) › 21_Publication in refereed journal › peer-review