The "Two Camps" Competition: the 1894 Hong Kong Plague in Two English Medical Journals

Ka-wai Fan*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

Abstract

Scholars have discussed at length whether Kitasato Shibasaburō or Alexandre Yersin was first to discover the plague bacillus in 1894. Through an analysis of publications as they appeared chronologically in The Lancet and the British Medical Journal (BMJ), this paper reveals that two camps competed to report the news of the plague, show their findings, and express their standpoints. One camp included Shibasaburō Kitasato, James Lowson and The Lancet, while the other included Alexandre Yersin, James Centlie and the BMJ. This paper concludes that when discussing who was first to discover the plague bacillus, the historical facts should be made clear, especially the “two camps” competition. The roles of James Lowson and James Cantlie and their publications in the controversial debate on the discovery of the plague bacillus should not be neglected.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere2022018
JournalMedicina Historica
Volume6
Issue number2
Online published26 Aug 2022
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2022

Funding

The work described in this article was fully supported by a grant from the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China (project no. 9043270, CityU 11609921)

Research Keywords

  • Alexandre Yersin
  • James Lowson
  • James Cantlie
  • Shibasaburō Kitasato
  • the British Medical Journal
  • The Lancet
  • the Plague Bacillus

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The "Two Camps" Competition: the 1894 Hong Kong Plague in Two English Medical Journals'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this