Abstract
This article examines two competing theories explaining the effects of political satire on citizens in an authoritarian context. The “activism” proposition argues that political satire works as a form of resistance to erode people’s support for the regime and encourages collective action. The “cynicism” proposition argues that while satire discourages regime support, it also discourages political participation. Our online survey experiment on young Chinese Internet users provides evidence supporting the cynicism proposition. Satire consumption reduces audiences’ political trust, deflates their political efficacy, and discourages them from participating in politics, as it reduces the perceived severity of political problems and implies that audience participation is useless. We conclude that the dissemination of political satire may stabilize the authoritarian regime temporarily but induces it to become erosive in the long run.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 517-536 |
Journal | Political Studies |
Volume | 67 |
Issue number | 2 |
Online published | 3 Aug 2018 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - May 2019 |
Externally published | Yes |
Research Keywords
- authoritarianism
- China
- experiment
- online activism
- political effect
- political satire