TY - JOUR
T1 - The Right to Representation by Criminal Defense Counsel in Ethiopia
T2 - A Critical Analysis
AU - GURMESSA, Nurilign Mulugeta
PY - 2018/9
Y1 - 2018/9
N2 - This paper explores and critically reflects on the legal foundations and
the practice of criminal defense in Ethiopia within the overall due process framework
of a fair criminal trial. A brief review of Ethiopian constitutional history shows that
the right to representation by legal counsel has been one of the fundamental due
process rights granted to accused persons in criminal proceedings. The constitutional
right to counsel is, however, not specified by detailed legal provisions. A logical
consequence of this is that the enjoyment of this right is fraught with legal and
practical problems. While the legal problems, among other things, include obscurity
regarding the scope and content of the right, the practical problems include absence
of public defense offices at district levels where the vast majority of criminal proceedings take place. Consequently, accused persons appear during trials without the
aid of legal counsel; they are in fact deprived of their due process rights and
marginalized. This has a number of legal ramifications both to the accused and the
criminal justice system. In sum, the constitutional provision of the right to criminal
defense counsel is undelivered and remains a hollow promise. It is therefore difficult
to uphold the constitutional norms which underlie criminal trial process such as
procedural justice, as well as the legitimacy of the government. The justice sectors are
responsible to ensuring due process and equal protection. Substantial justice reforms
are needed at all levels.© Springer Nature B.V. 2018
AB - This paper explores and critically reflects on the legal foundations and
the practice of criminal defense in Ethiopia within the overall due process framework
of a fair criminal trial. A brief review of Ethiopian constitutional history shows that
the right to representation by legal counsel has been one of the fundamental due
process rights granted to accused persons in criminal proceedings. The constitutional
right to counsel is, however, not specified by detailed legal provisions. A logical
consequence of this is that the enjoyment of this right is fraught with legal and
practical problems. While the legal problems, among other things, include obscurity
regarding the scope and content of the right, the practical problems include absence
of public defense offices at district levels where the vast majority of criminal proceedings take place. Consequently, accused persons appear during trials without the
aid of legal counsel; they are in fact deprived of their due process rights and
marginalized. This has a number of legal ramifications both to the accused and the
criminal justice system. In sum, the constitutional provision of the right to criminal
defense counsel is undelivered and remains a hollow promise. It is therefore difficult
to uphold the constitutional norms which underlie criminal trial process such as
procedural justice, as well as the legitimacy of the government. The justice sectors are
responsible to ensuring due process and equal protection. Substantial justice reforms
are needed at all levels.© Springer Nature B.V. 2018
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051443502&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.scopus.com/record/pubmetrics.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85051443502&origin=recordpage
U2 - 10.1007/s10609-018-9349-8
DO - 10.1007/s10609-018-9349-8
M3 - RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal
SN - 1046-8374
VL - 29
SP - 435
EP - 473
JO - Criminal Law Forum
JF - Criminal Law Forum
IS - 3
ER -