Projects per year
Abstract
This article offers, for the first time, a comprehensive survey of all accessible (28) Chinese cases in which Chinese judges or lawyers invoked the Unidroit Principles of International Commercial Contracts (PICC) as applicable law or otherwise made a reference to the PICC. The survey has a particular focus on the use of the PICC to interpret or supplement domestic law, which is widely assumed to have no direct impact on the decisions of local courts. Through a detailed analysis that explores the often-times subtle connection between the PICC and judicial reasoning in Chinese courtrooms, the survey rebuts the 'no direct impact' thesis and demonstrates and expounds a range of significant roles the PICC may play in this respect. In doing so, this article also illustrates the case-guiding effect of previously little-known case comments-the dominant vehicle by which Chinese judges presently make the above use of the PICC.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 472-491 |
| Journal | Uniform Law Review |
| Volume | 27 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Aug 2022 |
Funding
Research conducted in completing this chapter has been supported by 2021 Hong Kong General Research Fund (Project no 11608821, entitled ‘Addressing Impediments or Hardship to Contract Performance: A Comparative Study of the Common Law in Hong Kong and Chinese Law’).
RGC Funding Information
- RGC-funded
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The PICC in Chinese Courts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Projects
- 1 Active
-
GRF: Addressing Impediments or Hardship to Contract Performance: A Comparative Study of the Common Law in Hong Kong and Chinese Law
LIU, Q. (Principal Investigator / Project Coordinator), Chen, L. (Co-Investigator) & McKendrick, E. (Co-Investigator)
1/01/22 → …
Project: Research