The PICC in Chinese Courts

Qiao Liu*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This article offers, for the first time, a comprehensive survey of all accessible (28) Chinese cases in which Chinese judges or lawyers invoked the Unidroit Principles of International Commercial Contracts (PICC) as applicable law or otherwise made a reference to the PICC. The survey has a particular focus on the use of the PICC to interpret or supplement domestic law, which is widely assumed to have no direct impact on the decisions of local courts. Through a detailed analysis that explores the often-times subtle connection between the PICC and judicial reasoning in Chinese courtrooms, the survey rebuts the 'no direct impact' thesis and demonstrates and expounds a range of significant roles the PICC may play in this respect. In doing so, this article also illustrates the case-guiding effect of previously little-known case comments-the dominant vehicle by which Chinese judges presently make the above use of the PICC.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)472-491
JournalUniform Law Review
Volume27
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2022

Funding

Research conducted in completing this chapter has been supported by 2021 Hong Kong General Research Fund (Project no 11608821, entitled ‘Addressing Impediments or Hardship to Contract Performance: A Comparative Study of the Common Law in Hong Kong and Chinese Law’).

RGC Funding Information

  • RGC-funded

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The PICC in Chinese Courts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this