Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The (Non-)Expiration of Parental Responsibility: Balancing the Child’s Wishes, Second Families, and Parents’ Ability in Maintenance for Adult Children - UYT v UYU [2020] SGFC 81; [2020] SGHCF 8 [Case Note]

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

Abstract

In deciding whether to award child maintenance in Singapore, the courts’ main considerations are the parents’ ability and the child’s needs. This is further complicated when it involves an adult child who has developed their own views and want to decide on their own future. This note explores the courts’ difficulty in exercising their discretion in UYT v UYU [2020] SGFC 81; [2020] SGHCF 8 to grant maintenance to an adult child when the child’s needs are in conflict with the parent’s wishes and the needs of the second family. The author suggests that future child support guidelines should include maintenance for further education.

© 2021 Contributor(s) and Singapore Academy of Law
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)645-661
Number of pages17
JournalSingapore Academy of Law Journal
Volume33
Online published16 Feb 2021
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2021
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The (Non-)Expiration of Parental Responsibility: Balancing the Child’s Wishes, Second Families, and Parents’ Ability in Maintenance for Adult Children - UYT v UYU [2020] SGFC 81; [2020] SGHCF 8 [Case Note]'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this