Abstract
This article analyses the economic, political, and institutional antecedents and performance effects of the adoption of shared Senior Management Teams (SMTs)—a management innovation (MI) that occurs when a team of senior managers oversees two or more public organizations. Findings from statistical analysis of 201 English local governments and interviews with organizational leaders reveal that shared SMTs are adopted to develop organizational capacity in resource-challenged, politically risk-averse governments, and in response to coercive and mimetic institutional pressures. Importantly, sharing SMTs may reduce rather than enhance efficiency and effectiveness due to redundancy costs and the political transaction costs associated with diverting resources away from a high-performing partner to support their lower-performing counterpart.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 625-637 |
| Journal | Public Administration Review |
| Volume | 81 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Online published | 4 Mar 2021 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jul 2021 |
Publisher's Copyright Statement
- This full text is made available under CC-BY 4.0. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Motivations for the Adoption of Management Innovation by Local Governments and its Performance Effects'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver