Abstract
I propose a multiperiod matching model of firms and managers to explain that labor market sorting with imperfect measures may not guarantee economic efficiency in matching. In the model, firms compete for managerial talent and managers are concerned about their reputation. Due to the trade-off between match efficiency from productive complementarity and agency costs from managers’ reputational concerns, assortative matching of firms and managers may fail. I derive sufficient conditions for such failure with respect to the size distributions of firms. The model can be applied to various agency problems with consideration of the labor market for managers, which will be particularly useful for analyzing cross-sectional patterns of two-sided matching, and aggregate firm performance and agency costs.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Publication status | Published - 6 Aug 2017 |
| Event | Junior Accounting Theory Conference 2017 - UC San Diego, San Diego, United States Duration: 6 Aug 2017 → 6 Aug 2017 Conference number: 7th http://www.accountingtheory.org/jatc-2017 |
Conference
| Conference | Junior Accounting Theory Conference 2017 |
|---|---|
| Abbreviated title | JATC 2017 |
| Place | United States |
| City | San Diego |
| Period | 6/08/17 → 6/08/17 |
| Internet address |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The market for reputation: Repeated Matching and Career Concerns'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver