Abstract
In The Case of the Monetary Gold Removed from Rome in 1943, the International Court of Justice concluded that it cannot decide a dispute in which a third party's legal interests “would form the very subject-matter of the decision.” This Article argues that what has become known as the Monetary Gold principle conflicts with the Court's obligation to decide cases submitted by consenting parties and should be abandoned. Copyright © 2021 by The American Society of International Law
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 41-77 |
| Journal | American Journal of International Law |
| Volume | 115 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Online published | 23 Oct 2020 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jan 2021 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The monetary gold principle: Back to basics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver