The Governance Challenges of the Government Performance and Results Act : A Case Study of the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Administration

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

View graph of relations

Author(s)

Detail(s)

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)369-397
Journal / PublicationPublic Performance & Management Review
Volume30
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2007
Externally publishedYes

Abstract

This study uses a case study of the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) to investigate the governance challenges of implementing the Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) in recent years. Interdepartmental rivalry and lack of coordination, the complex relationship between the federal government and state governments in managing programs, and challenges in balancing diverse stakeholders' demands have made the strategic planning exercise of GPRA an uphill battle. The situation is further complicated by the conflicting demands from GRPA and the Performance Assessment Tool and the assertiveness of the White House in its performance budgeting initiatives in recent years. The case shows that implementation of GPRA inevitably involves many governance challenges and redistribution of power among various political actors.

Research Area(s)

  • governance of performance measurement, Government Performance and Results Act, Performance Assessment Rating Tool