Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The “Externalities” of Joint Interpretations in Investment Arbitration: Learning from the Past

  • Chen Yu*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

Abstract

The joint interpretation mechanism is gaining increasing attention in the recent practice and study of international investment law. In the past, the NAFTA Free Trade Commission exercised this interpretative authority by issuing the controversial Notes of Interpretation which limit the scope of fair and equitable treatment (FET) to customary international law. While much has been debated about the legitimacy of the Notes in the context of NAFTA arbitration, this article examines its influence on tribunals not bound by it (i.e. non-NAFTA tribunals). An extensive review of cases shows that non-NAFTA tribunals are generally cautious about directly applying the Notes to their own interpretation, while some followed NAFTA precedents shaped by the Notes. Considering the possible proliferation of the joint interpretation mechanism in the future, this article further examines the role of third states' joint interpretations in treaty interpretation through the lens of Articles 31 and 32 of the VCLT. © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2023.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)194-218
JournalLaw and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals
Volume22
Issue number1
Online published3 Mar 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2023
Externally publishedYes

Research Keywords

  • fair and equitable treatment
  • investment arbitration
  • Investor-State Dispute Settlement
  • joint interpretation
  • treaty interpretation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The “Externalities” of Joint Interpretations in Investment Arbitration: Learning from the Past'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this