The Expectancy‐Disconfirmation Model and Citizen Satisfaction with Public Services: A Meta‐analysis and an Agenda for Best Practice

Jiasheng Zhang, Wenna Chen, Nicolai Petrovsky, Richard M. Walker*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

127 Citations (Scopus)
386 Downloads (CityUHK Scholars)

Abstract

The expectancy‐disconfirmation model has become the predominant approach to explaining citizen satisfaction with public services. It posits that citizens compare the performance of a service against their expectations of that service. Satisfaction occurs if the perceived performance meets or exceeds expectations. We provide the first meta‐analysis of the empirical evidence on this relationship, and we find that the model is supported across studies. However, our meta‐analysis also indicates that research design choices affect the results and that the scope of public services examined is not comprehensive. We make best practice recommendations for future research to improve the measurement of citizen satisfaction.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)147-159
JournalPublic Administration Review
Volume82
Issue number1
Online published25 Feb 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2022

Publisher's Copyright Statement

  • This full text is made available under CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Expectancy‐Disconfirmation Model and Citizen Satisfaction with Public Services: A Meta‐analysis and an Agenda for Best Practice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this