The Development of an Instrument for Measuring the Suitability of Using GSS to Support Meetings
Research output: Chapters, Conference Papers, Creative and Literary Works › RGC 32 - Refereed conference paper (with host publication) › peer-review
Author(s)
Related Research Unit(s)
Detail(s)
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | PACIS 1995 Proceedings |
Pages | 21-29 |
Publication status | Published - Jun 1995 |
Conference
Title | 2nd Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS 1995) |
---|---|
Place | Singapore |
Period | 29 June - 2 July 1995 |
Link(s)
Document Link | Links
|
---|---|
Permanent Link | https://scholars.cityu.edu.hk/en/publications/publication(042f9646-8300-4275-8ac5-9459d9acdf2f).html |
Abstract
Over the past decade, a considerable amount of research, both in the laboratory and in the field, has been conducted into Group Support Systems (GSS). A significant proportion of the published research has been experimental, with a variety of subjects undertaking tasks assigned to them by the researchers, in conditions generated by the researchers. This has been true particularly in lab settings. While such work has been valuable, we believe that we should also examine how a group behaves before it has any notion of using GSS to support its meetings. Through such research, we believe that we can more precisely identify not only whether or not a meeting is likely to be suitable for GSS support, but also how well a GSS does support a meeting, post-implementation. This paper presents the design of an instrument that measures meetings in terms of a number of variables. Participant satisfaction is used as a surrogate measure of system success.
Citation Format(s)
The Development of an Instrument for Measuring the Suitability of Using GSS to Support Meetings. / Davison, Robert.
PACIS 1995 Proceedings. 1995. p. 21-29.
PACIS 1995 Proceedings. 1995. p. 21-29.
Research output: Chapters, Conference Papers, Creative and Literary Works › RGC 32 - Refereed conference paper (with host publication) › peer-review