Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The comparison of psychological adjustment of patients with cleft lip and palate after maxillary distraction osteogenesis and conventional orthognathic surgery

Hannah Daile P. Chua, Samuel M.Y. Ho, Lim Kwong Cheung

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to compare the psychological changes of patients with cleft lip and palate (CLP) undergoing maxillary Le Fort I advancement by distraction osteogenesis (DO) and conventional orthognathic surgery (CO). Study design: Prospective randomized controlled study. Participants completed a set of questionnaires to measure their psychological states preoperatively and postoperatively. Result: When compared with CO, CLP patients treated with DO had lower social self-esteem and higher social avoidance and distress levels during the first 3 postoperative months. Their self-esteem, social avoidance, and distress levels improved after the distractors were removed. Both CO and DO patients had similar levels of self-esteem, social avoidance, and distress levels 2 years postoperatively. The CLP patients treated with DO were more satisfied with their lives after 2 years. Conclusions: DO may induce short-term distress to patients up to 3 months but CLP patients who received DO were more satisfied with their lives in the long term. © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Original languageEnglish
JournalOral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology
Volume114
Issue numberSUPPL. 5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2012
Externally publishedYes

Policy Impact

  • Cited in Policy Documents

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The comparison of psychological adjustment of patients with cleft lip and palate after maxillary distraction osteogenesis and conventional orthognathic surgery'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this