The assessment of thrombotic markers utilizing ionic versus non-ionic contrast during coronary angiography and intervention trial

Binita Shah*, Jeffrey S. Berger, Nicole Allen, Yu Guo, Steven P. Sedlis, Jinfeng Xu, Adriana Perez, Michael Attubato, James Slater, Frederick Feit

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

Abstract

Objective: To determine how two different types of iodinated contrast media (CM), low-osmolar ionic dimer ioxaglate (Hexabrix) and iso-osmolar non-ionic dimer iodixanol (Visipaque), affect multiple indices of hemostasis. Background: In vitro models demonstrate differential effects of ionic and non-ionic CM on markers of hemostasis. Methods: This blinded endpoint trial randomized 100 patients to ioxaglate or iodixanol. The primary endpoint was change in endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) following diagnostic angiography. Secondary endpoints included change in markers of fibrinolysis [tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) and plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (PAI-1)] and platelet aggregation following diagnostic angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with bivalirudin. Data are presented as median [interquartile range]. Results: ETP significantly decreased after diagnostic angiography in both ioxaglate (baseline 1810 nM*minute [1540-2089] to post-angiography 649 nM*minute [314-1347], p < 0.001) and iodixanol groups (baseline 1682 nM*minute [1534-2147] to post-angiography 681 nM*minute [229-1237], p < 0.001), but the decrease was not different between CM (p = 0.70). There was a significant increase in ETP during PCI (n = 45), despite the use of bivalirudin, suggesting a prothrombotic effect of PCI (post-angiography 764 nM*minute [286-1283] to post-PCI 1081 nM*minute [668-1552], p = 0.02). There were no significant differential effects on tPA, PAI-1, and markers of platelet activity. Conclusion: There were no significant differential effects between ioxaglate and iodixanol. Both CM led to significant reductions in thrombin generation and no significant effects on fibrinolytic activity or platelet activity, thereby contributing to a favorable antithrombotic milieu. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)727-737
JournalCatheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Volume88
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2016
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publication details (e.g. title, author(s), publication statuses and dates) are captured on an “AS IS” and “AS AVAILABLE” basis at the time of record harvesting from the data source. Suggestions for further amendments or supplementary information can be sent to [email protected].

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Research Keywords

  • cardiac catheterization
  • contrast
  • thrombosis and haemostasis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The assessment of thrombotic markers utilizing ionic versus non-ionic contrast during coronary angiography and intervention trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this