Teacher efficacy: A comparative study of Hong Kong and Shanghai primary in-service teachers

Hoi Yan Cheung

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

81 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Teachers beliefs about their ability to affect students' performance is an important part of professionalism. This study compared 725 Hong Kong and 575 Shanghai primary in-service teachers on their teacher efficacy. Two Chinese versions of the 12-item Teachers' Sense of Efficacy Scale were used in this study since some wordings of the Hang Kong version of the Scale (HK-TSE) were different from the Shanghai version (S-TSE) as a result of cultural differences. Basically, the Shanghai teachers reported significantly higher efficacy than did the Hong Kong teachers. After reviewing these quantitative results, 86 follow-up questionnaires from Shanghai in-service teachers who also participated in the first part of this study were collected. Results of this qualitative part showed that the three most commonly cited factors for the contribution of teacher efficacy were: respect and confidence placed in them by students and parents, the training they received from universities and the experience they gained from daily teaching practice. Though Hong Kong in-service teachers bad lower efficacy scores than the Shanghai counterparts.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)103-123
JournalAustralian Educational Researcher
Volume35
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2008

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Teacher efficacy: A comparative study of Hong Kong and Shanghai primary in-service teachers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this