Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Systematic Review of Fake News’s Continued Influence Effect (CIE)

Research output: Conference PapersRGC 32 - Refereed conference paper (without host publication)peer-review

Abstract

This systematic review offers foundational insights into the research of the Continued Influence Effect (CIE) or backfire effect within the realm of misinformation. It collates findings from both a quantitative (methodological characteristics) and qualitative (variables and their interplay with the central concept of “continued influence effect or backfire effect”) standpoint.
Drawn from the database of the Web of Science, a sample of peer-reviewed quantitative journal articles (n = 38) published from 2019 to 2023 was coded in terms of the measurement employed to assess the CIE following the debunking of misinformation, the dependent variables used to measure the CIE, the factors that foster the development and spread of CIE, and the interventions that have successfully reduced CIE. A systematic conceptual map of the CIE is presented to summarize the complex dynamics of this phenomenon. The review acknowledges the
inconsistent findings from prior studies, and it concludes with a set of recommendations aimed at enhancing future research on CIE.
Original languageEnglish
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2025
Event75th Annual ICA Conference (ICA 2025): Disrupting and Consolidating Communication Research - Denver, United States
Duration: 12 Jun 202516 Jun 2025
https://www.icahdq.org/mpage/ICA25

Conference

Conference75th Annual ICA Conference (ICA 2025)
Abbreviated titleICA25
PlaceUnited States
CityDenver
Period12/06/2516/06/25
Internet address

Bibliographical note

Information for this record is supplemented by the author(s) concerned.

Research Keywords

  • fake news
  • Systematic review
  • continued influence effect
  • Backfire Effect

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Systematic Review of Fake News’s Continued Influence Effect (CIE)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this