Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Synergies of co-infecting pathogens, sea lice (Lepeophetheirus salmonis) and Moritella viscosa, are impacted by exposure order, and host response to initial infection

  • Wenlong Cai*
  • , Liang Zhong
  • , Kathleen Parrish
  • , Surendra Kumar
  • , Khalil Eslamloo
  • , Eyesun Fajei
  • , Shona K. Whyte
  • , Sara L. Purcell
  • , Ladan Jahangiri
  • , Runsheng LI
  • , Albert Caballero Solares
  • , Richard G. Taylor
  • , Rachel Balder
  • , Matthew L. Rise
  • , Mark D. Fast*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

Abstract

Sea lice infestations and winter ulcer disease caused by Moritella viscosa are two major challenges for the Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) aquaculture industry. Despite their common tropisms for the skin/muscle we know very little about the interaction between these two significant pathogens. The objective of this study was to elucidate the transcriptomic response of Atlantic salmon to sea louse (Lepeophtheirus salmonis) and M. viscosa under single infection and different scenarios of co-infection (i.e. first, L. salmonis and then, M. viscosa and vice versa). After exposure, sampling was performed from the infestation site as well as the adjacent area on fish skin, followed by transcriptome analysis. RNA-seq analysis revealed that infection with either L. salmonis or M. viscosa induced a significant immune response from the skin and resulted in extensive transcriptomic changes. More differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were detected at M. viscosa lesion sites compared to L. salmonis attachment sites. In addition, the effect of the infection order was evaluated. Interestingly, we found that primary infection with lice was associated with a significantly higher number of DEGs during the co-infection process on fish skin compared to the fish first infected with M. viscosa (721 and 5336 DEGs from lice attachment and M. viscosa lesion sites, respectively, vs 291 and 3601 DEGs from lice attachment and M. viscosa lesion sites, respectively). We also found that lice infection caused localized effects on the skin of Atlantic salmon, while single infection with M. viscosa caused a moderate systemic impact and inhibited the tissue repair function of the skin, leading to severe ulceration. In addition, the C-type lectin receptor signaling pathway was drastically activated at the lice attachment sites during both lice alone- and co-infections, regardless of the order of infections, and similar results were observed in M. viscosa infection at both lesion and adjacent sites, indicating that this pathway played an essential role for immunity in Atlantic salmon. A more intense inflammatory and immune response was also observed at M. viscosa lesion sites. These results will promote our understanding of the immune interactions between L. salmonis and M. viscosa during the co-infection process and provide insights for the development of preventive and treatment strategies for these pathogens in salmon aquaculture.

© 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.
Original languageEnglish
Article number741115
JournalAquaculture
Volume591
Online published21 May 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Oct 2024

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 14 - Life Below Water
    SDG 14 Life Below Water

Research Keywords

  • Co-infection
  • Infection order
  • Immune response
  • Inflammation response
  • C-type lectin receptor signaling pathway

Publisher's Copyright Statement

  • COPYRIGHT TERMS OF DEPOSITED POSTPRINT FILE: © 2024 Elsevier. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Policy Impact

  • Cited in Policy Documents

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Synergies of co-infecting pathogens, sea lice (Lepeophetheirus salmonis) and Moritella viscosa, are impacted by exposure order, and host response to initial infection'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this