Supervisory procedural justice effects: The mediating roles of cognitive and affective trust

Jixia Yang, Kevin W. Mossholder, T. K. Peng

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

178 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We tested a model in which two bases of trust mediated the effects of supervisory procedural justice. Two conceptually distinct mechanisms were proposed to explain how different procedural justice effects are manifested. Structural equation modeling results using 203 individuals with matched supervisory ratings from a cross-section of organizations located in Taiwan supported our model. Cognitive trust mediated the relations of supervisory procedural justice with performance and job satisfaction, whereas affective trust mediated relations between supervisory procedural justice and helping behavior at work. © 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)143-154
JournalLeadership Quarterly
Volume20
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2009

Research Keywords

  • Affective trust
  • Cognitive trust
  • Procedural justice

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Supervisory procedural justice effects: The mediating roles of cognitive and affective trust'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this