Subjective time in organizations: Conceptual clarification, integration, and implications for future research

Shi Tang*, Andreas W. Richter, Sucheta Nadkarni

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Journal Publications and ReviewsRGC 21 - Publication in refereed journalpeer-review

47 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Despite the rapid growth of organizational research on subjective time, the extant literature is fragmented due to a lack of conceptual clarification and integration of temporal constructs. To address this fragmentation, we synthesize temporal research from both organizational behavior and adjacent disciplines (i.e., strategy, entrepreneurship, and organizational theory) and introduce a framework that allocates temporal constructs according to their basic conceptual nature (trait–state) and level of analysis (individual–collective). We employed the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count text analysis to determine the trait–state property of the constructs and a coding method to determine their level of analysis. This framework categorizes four generic types of subjective time: individual temporal disposition, individual temporal state, collective temporal state, and collective temporal disposition. We clarify the conceptualizations of the temporal constructs belonging to each of the four archetypes of subjective time and review their key findings in the organizational literature. Based on this integrative framework, we identify critical knowledge gaps in the current state of research and chart a future agenda with specific suggestions.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)210-234
JournalJournal of Organizational Behavior
Volume41
Issue number2
Online published3 Nov 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2020
Externally publishedYes

Research Keywords

  • multilevel research
  • subjective time
  • temporal constructs
  • trait–state distinction

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Subjective time in organizations: Conceptual clarification, integration, and implications for future research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this