Structuring papers for success: Making your paper more like a high impact publication than a desk reject

Hongyi Sun; Jonathan D. Linton

doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2014.07.008

Structuring papers for success: Making your paper more like a high impact publication than a desk reject

Hongyi Sun, Jonathan D. Linton

Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews › RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal › peer-review

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A comparison is made between the structure of 10 high impact papers and 50 desk-rejects. In doing so, authors are offered empirical evidence and insights into why papers that have a high impact not only differ from unsuccessful papers in terms of content, but also their structure. While excellent content is needed for high impact, appropriate structure is also required. Obtaining the appropriate structure is the first and easiest step. The intent of this editorial is to assist authors to recognize and make this important step. © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. Allrights reserved.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	571-573
Journal	Technovation
Volume	34
Issue number	10
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2014.07.008
Publication status	Published - Oct 2014

Research Keywords

Comparison
Paper strucuture

Access Output

10.1016/j.technovation.2014.07.008

Other Access Options

Check CityUHK Library

Permanent Link

Right click to copy link

Cite this

@article{13094027205e42b087636515eb8281e2,

title = "Structuring papers for success: Making your paper more like a high impact publication than a desk reject",

abstract = "A comparison is made between the structure of 10 high impact papers and 50 desk-rejects. In doing so, authors are offered empirical evidence and insights into why papers that have a high impact not only differ from unsuccessful papers in terms of content, but also their structure. While excellent content is needed for high impact, appropriate structure is also required. Obtaining the appropriate structure is the first and easiest step. The intent of this editorial is to assist authors to recognize and make this important step. {\textcopyright} 2014 Elsevier Ltd. Allrights reserved.",

keywords = "Comparison, Paper strucuture",

author = "Hongyi Sun and Linton, {Jonathan D.}",

year = "2014",

month = oct,

doi = "10.1016/j.technovation.2014.07.008",

language = "English",

volume = "34",

pages = "571--573",

journal = "Technovation",

issn = "0166-4972",

publisher = "Elsevier Ltd.",

number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Structuring papers for success

T2 - Making your paper more like a high impact publication than a desk reject

AU - Sun, Hongyi

AU - Linton, Jonathan D.

PY - 2014/10

Y1 - 2014/10

N2 - A comparison is made between the structure of 10 high impact papers and 50 desk-rejects. In doing so, authors are offered empirical evidence and insights into why papers that have a high impact not only differ from unsuccessful papers in terms of content, but also their structure. While excellent content is needed for high impact, appropriate structure is also required. Obtaining the appropriate structure is the first and easiest step. The intent of this editorial is to assist authors to recognize and make this important step. © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. Allrights reserved.

AB - A comparison is made between the structure of 10 high impact papers and 50 desk-rejects. In doing so, authors are offered empirical evidence and insights into why papers that have a high impact not only differ from unsuccessful papers in terms of content, but also their structure. While excellent content is needed for high impact, appropriate structure is also required. Obtaining the appropriate structure is the first and easiest step. The intent of this editorial is to assist authors to recognize and make this important step. © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. Allrights reserved.

KW - Comparison

KW - Paper strucuture

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84906781292&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.scopus.com/record/pubmetrics.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84906781292&origin=recordpage

U2 - 10.1016/j.technovation.2014.07.008

DO - 10.1016/j.technovation.2014.07.008

M3 - RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal

SN - 0166-4972

VL - 34

SP - 571

EP - 573

JO - Technovation

JF - Technovation

IS - 10

ER -

Structuring papers for success: Making your paper more like a high impact publication than a desk reject

Abstract

Research Keywords

Access Output

Other Access Options

Permanent Link

Other Files and Links

Fingerprint

Cite this