TY - JOUR
T1 - Stress Test for EU's Investment Court System
T2 - How Will Investments Be Protected in the Comprehensive Agreement on Investment?
AU - Chaisse, Julien
AU - Ji, Xueliang
PY - 2022/1
Y1 - 2022/1
N2 - On 30 December 2020, the European Union (EU) and China agreed in principle to a revamped investment treaty: The Comprehensive Agreement on Investment (CAI). Notably, the EU and China have not decided which investment dispute resolution system will be included under the new agreement. Instead, the EU and China are continuing negotiations on this contentious topic. This article discusses the key features of the proposed investment court system in the context of the CAI negotiations to assess whether China could agree on such a paradigmatic change that would have systemic consequences. The article explains the objective reasons behind China's partial support for the proposed reforms to the existing investor-state arbitration system. For example, China has supported adding an appellate body without accepting the EU's full-fledged investment court proposal. Finally, the article identifies the points of convergence and divergence which will shape the CAI negotiations and pave the way to global investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) reform.
AB - On 30 December 2020, the European Union (EU) and China agreed in principle to a revamped investment treaty: The Comprehensive Agreement on Investment (CAI). Notably, the EU and China have not decided which investment dispute resolution system will be included under the new agreement. Instead, the EU and China are continuing negotiations on this contentious topic. This article discusses the key features of the proposed investment court system in the context of the CAI negotiations to assess whether China could agree on such a paradigmatic change that would have systemic consequences. The article explains the objective reasons behind China's partial support for the proposed reforms to the existing investor-state arbitration system. For example, China has supported adding an appellate body without accepting the EU's full-fledged investment court proposal. Finally, the article identifies the points of convergence and divergence which will shape the CAI negotiations and pave the way to global investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) reform.
KW - Achmea case
KW - Comprehensive agreement on investment (CAI)
KW - Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA)
KW - European Commission
KW - EUVietnam Free Trade Agreement (EVFTA)
KW - financial responsibility regulation
KW - investment court system (ICS) United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL Working Group III)
KW - investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS)
KW - State-to-state dispute resolution
UR - http://gateway.isiknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS&KeyUT=000754384600005
UR - https://www.scopus.com/record/pubmetrics.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85130688493&origin=recordpage
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85130688493&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.54648/LEIE2022005
DO - 10.54648/LEIE2022005
M3 - RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal
SN - 1566-6573
VL - 49
SP - 101
EP - 124
JO - Legal Issues of Economic Integration
JF - Legal Issues of Economic Integration
IS - 1
ER -