Split-Delivery Capacitated Arc-Routing Problem With Time Windows
Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews › RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal › peer-review
Author(s)
Related Research Unit(s)
Detail(s)
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 2882-2887 |
Journal / Publication | IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems |
Volume | 23 |
Issue number | 3 |
Online published | 15 Oct 2020 |
Publication status | Published - Mar 2022 |
Link(s)
Abstract
Motivated by some practical applications in urban services such as water sparkling, we study a split-delivery capacitated arc-routing problem with time windows (SDCARPTW). It is a variant of arc-routing problem and is defined on an undirected graph where the demands on the arcs are splitable, and time window and capacity constraints must be satisfied. We propose a mathematical formulation for SDCARPTW and derive some nice properties of the split-delivery structure, which can help to well represent a solution of SDCARPTW. The dynamic programming, neighborhood search and perturbation process are combined to develop a tabu search algorithm. Through computational studies on CARPTW benchmark datasets, we validate the effectiveness and efficiency of our proposed algorithm. New datasets for SDCARPTW are further proposed and the impact of the split-delivery option is analyzed.
Research Area(s)
- Routing, Microsoft Windows, Intelligent transportation systems, Heuristic algorithms, Computational modeling, Mathematical model, Dynamic programming, Split-delivery, arc-routing problem (ARP), tabu search, BRANCH, PRICE, CUT
Citation Format(s)
Split-Delivery Capacitated Arc-Routing Problem With Time Windows. / Lai, Qidong; Zhang, Zizhen; Yu, Mingzhu et al.
In: IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vol. 23, No. 3, 03.2022, p. 2882-2887.
In: IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vol. 23, No. 3, 03.2022, p. 2882-2887.
Research output: Journal Publications and Reviews › RGC 21 - Publication in refereed journal › peer-review